| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
swiharta
Bobcat
Joined: September/22/2004
Points: 60
|
Topic: Lynx USB2 / Firewire products? Posted: September/30/2004 at 12:49pm |
|
Any news on USB2 or Firewire products from Lynx? Thanks
|
 |
swiharta
Bobcat
Joined: September/22/2004
Points: 60
|
Posted: October/09/2004 at 8:59am |
|
hey are any new products in development, please give me something, thanks!
|
 |
PaulTech
Admin Group
Joined: August/13/2004
Location: United States
Points: 4149
|
Posted: October/11/2004 at 10:18am |
Hi Swiharta,
Unfortunately we cannot discuss new product developments. However, customer suggestions and wishes are considered when new products are developed.
Best Regards,
|
|
|
 |
Radiance
Bobcat
Joined: August/25/2004
Location: France
Points: 44
|
Posted: October/11/2004 at 4:05pm |
In that case: I really wish for firewire products from Lynx.
|
 |
swiharta
Bobcat
Joined: September/22/2004
Points: 60
|
Posted: October/16/2004 at 5:49am |
|
me too, plus how about some kind of midi add-on card for the Lynx 2 and
AES-16 cards? I'm not sure what you guys were thinking when you
left that out. If there is a Lynx3 in the works, please include
MIDI. MIDI as a basic technology won't die for a while and most
music makers use it in some form or another, also MIDI cable connectors
won't die until audio and midi are all transmitted by a single cable,
ala Yamaha's mLan.
|
 |
crna59
Caracal
Joined: September/28/2004
Location: United States
Points: 21
|
Posted: October/16/2004 at 3:43pm |
|
Plus MIDI will help with people who have a GigaStudio Rig like me. Since the LynxONE doesn't have GSIF2 support, just add MIDI to a LynxTWO..... or something!!
|
|
Bruce A. Brown
Puget Sound Studios & Mastering
AES and Recording Academy Member
It is easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission! Buy! Buy buy....
|
 |
creative_world
Caracal
Joined: October/24/2004
Location: Italy
Points: 2
|
Posted: October/24/2004 at 10:11am |
|
I work whit ProTools HD3 and a Lynx AES16 on G4 (w/4 PCI slots) to put
Logic plugs on PT sw. But considering to upgrade to G5 whith only 3
slots, could be interesting to have at last 8 AES channels on firewire in a
future AES08/16-fw.
|
|
Creative Mastering
High End Audio Mastering - Restoration - Editing
for SACD and CD production.
Italy
www.creativemastering.com
|
 |
blazar
Bobcat
Joined: February/21/2005
Points: 52
|
Posted: February/26/2005 at 12:25pm |
Once a firewire port/card is created for the Aurora, will that be all that is needed to connect it to the pc and control it?
The aurora mixer software will control the aurora functions via firewire? Sorry if these are questions are too "basic".
The all important question, what would one guess is the price range of these expansion cards? $100? $200? more? Clearly this is important in determining buying another lynx card versus an expansion card if all you need is 8 channels.
|
 |
David A Hoatson
Admin Group
Forum Administrator
Joined: October/01/2003
Location: Idaho
Points: 3756
|
Posted: February/26/2005 at 9:04pm |
Once a firewire port/card is created for the Aurora, will that be all that is needed to connect it to the pc and control it? |
Yes - Control and record/play will all go over IEEE-1394.
The aurora mixer software will control the aurora functions via firewire? Sorry if these are questions are too "basic". |
Yes.
Don't know the pricing yet. If I had to guess (my crystal ball has a crack in it, looking for a new one on eBay), I would say our IEEE-1394 card would be similar in price to our competitors converters Firewire add on card.
|
|
Thank you,
David A. Hoatson Lynx Studio Technology, Inc. Co-founder, Chief Software Engineer
|
 |
blazar
Bobcat
Joined: February/21/2005
Points: 52
|
Posted: March/26/2005 at 8:48pm |
would heavy firewire traffic be affected by use of pci bandwidth by say ethernet or other devices like graphics cards?
I'm curious if high cpu, network, graphics card processing would result in artifacts caused by limitations of firewire bandwidth to the cpu.
|
 |
hansap
Caracal
Joined: March/04/2005
Points: 17
|
Posted: March/29/2005 at 10:17am |
Some of that is inevitable when you move lots of data in and out. Workstation and server chipsets [vs. desktop chipsets] try to soften the blow with additional buses and multiple CPUs so that the latency stays within the requirements of the job at hand even under heavy loads.
But the whole thing is even more complicated than that in audio because there are a lot of different kind of heavy loads: when you do tracking and you want to use software effects you are looking for minimal latency for a path like "AD-in-app-plugin-app-out-DA" through your gear and your computer and back into some musicians headphones. There are buffers being passed and chunks of code activated throughout all this and it takes time every time.
That scenario is totally different from let's say recording 24 tracks of 192/32 audio non-stop and uninterrupted for two hours.
But one thing is true in both cases: if the CPU doesn't get around to servicing your data stream in time you are going to get "snap crackkkle pop" instead of music.
|
 |